Oh what a glorious day March 14th was for victims of bullying! Despite posting this just now and seeing the video a day ago, the support and clamor for victim Casey Heynes has done nothing but grow by leaps and bounds since the incident. Just to quickly summarize — Casey Heynes, age 15/16 now, had been subjected to bullying and ridicule his whole life for his stature, among other things. The bully who pushed him too far, Richard Gale, apparently had been causing Casey grief for several weeks prior to the incident. After being confronted by Richard and his little posse, armed with a video camera, Casey found himself pinned to a wall as I and many others have experienced. He took a direct blow to the face without provocation, deflected several attacks, and received two or three hits to the stomach, before snapping. Casey charged into Richard, grappled him, and made Youtube history with a beautiful display of self-defense in the form of a reality-inducing bodyslam. Sheer primal bliss.
Besides the obvious and always-welcome parodies + tribute videos, one groan-inducing video has been vying for equal attention; Richard’s version of the story. While its always important to hear the story from every angle, I can tell you that this story reeks of lies and a desperate plea for undeserved pity. Richard claims that he himself has been subjected to bullying, without mentioning any particular examples or instances. He then makes the bizarre claim that Casey had bullied him first, in the form of teasing. How odd. He also claimed that Casey had made him angry with words on that fateful day, and that he was simply unleashing an alleged hidden rage after “years of being bullied himself”. What makes me doubt every shred of this pity-video is not only Richard’s perplexing facial expressions that indicate he could be lying, but that his testimony does not make sense at all.
How could Casey be the bully and possibly have started the incident, when:
1) Richard is the one who brought along a group of friends to surround him
2) Richard had a friend bring a camera to record this obviously pre-meditated incident
3) Weeks prior, Richard had started teasing Casey calling him “fat” among other things
4) Richard threw the first punch directly to the face, then continued his punching-spree
Its all quite simple: Richard had gone from being the victim of bullying, to becoming one, and gained experience as one anywhere from 1 to several years. This is evident in his cocky demeanor; his audacity to attack a much larger opponent as well as his overtly confident boxer-esque footplay.
The bottom line?
Casey handled this beautifully. He retaliated out of self-defense, stepped away after slamming his aggressor down, and did so without crippling the immature bully.
Despite what alleged experts might say, don’t let them fool you. Walking away and telling adults does -Not- work in school, nor hardly anywhere else. This “walk away, tell a teacher or tell the principal (who is often times busy with his own problems or away from the building” babble is the very catalyst of these bullying problems. Ever since societies have attempted to be more “civilized”, bullying has gotten increasingly WORSE and the number of victims grows every year. Without proper parenting over the bullies, and without any fear of repercussion or self-defense from their victims, bullies enjoy a sense of power and control; not just over their own lives, but the lives of others.
Teaching to fight out of pure self-defense is what helps keep bullying and power-struggles in check. It keeps bullies from getting too big for their britches and shows them that the real world has dire consequences for one’s actions. It is a harsh blow from reality, but one needed in lieu of proper parenting.
Like so many others, I do not condone violence in schools. I do however, condone stylish self-defense. :3